You are here

604.5 Religious Based Exclusion from a School Program

Parents who wish to have their child excluded from a school program because of religious beliefs must inform the superintendent or superintendent’s designee.  The board authorizes the administration to allow the exclusion if it is not disruptive to the education program and it does not infringe on a compelling state or educational interest.  Further, the exclusion must not interfere with other school district operations.  Students who are allowed to be excluded from a program or activity which violates their religious beliefs are required to do an alternate supervised activity or study.

 

In notifying the superintendent or superintendent’s designee, the parents will abide by the following:

 

            The notice is in writing;

            The objection is based on religious beliefs;

            The objection will state which activities or studies violate their religious beliefs;

            The objection will state why these activities or studies violate their religious beliefs; and

            The objection will state a proposed alternate activity or study.

 

The superintendent or superintendent’s designee will have discretion to make this determination.  The factors the superintendent or superintendent’s designee will consider when a student requests to be excluded from a program or activity because of religious beliefs include, but are not limited to, staff available to supervise a student who wishes to be excluded, space to house the student while the student is excluded, available superintendent or superintendent’s-approved alternative course of study or activity while the student is excluded, number of students who wish to be excluded, whether allowing the exclusion places the school in a position of supporting a particular religion, and whether the program or activity is required for promotion to the next grade level or for graduation.

 

Date Board Adopted: 8/14/1989

Date Board Updated/Reviewed: 12/18/2017

 

 

Legal Reference:          U.S. Const. amend. I.

                                    Lee v. Weisman, 112 S.Ct. 2649 (1992).

                                    Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971).

                                    Graham v. Central Community School District of Decatur County, 608 F.Supp. 531 (S.D. Iowa 1985).

Iowa Code §§ 256.11(6); 279.8 (2013).